Mckesson - 16-4293 - Non - Adherent Dressing 3 X 4 Inch Sterile Rectangle - Case/1200

Note: Please purchase based on product "Code". Images are provided by manufacturers and might not represent the product accurately.

You may also need

In Stock
Price:
$0.12
Sold By:
Case of 1200
Adding to cart… The item has been added

Product Specifications

Below are the key product attributes and specifications that provide detailed information about this item:

Brand: Mckesson
Application: Wound Care
Sterility: Sterile
Material: Nylon/Polyester Blend
Shape: Rectangle
Product Color: White
Length: 4 In
Gender: Unisex
Product Size: 3 x 4 Inch
Adhesive Type: Non-Adherent (Without Border)
Absorbency: Light Absorbency
Border Type: Borderless
Product Dimensions: 3 x 4 In
Sold By: Case of 1200

Product Overview

Mckesson Non-Adherent Dressing 3 x 4 Inch Sterile Rectangle (16-4293)

The Mckesson Non-Adherent Dressing is a sterile wound cover designed to protect minor cuts, abrasions, and post-surgical incisions while promoting healing. Its non-stick layer prevents adhesion to the wound, minimizing discomfort during dressing changes. The 3 x 4-inch rectangular shape provides ample coverage for small to medium-sized wounds.

Features:
- Non-adherent surface prevents sticking to wounds
- Sterile for safe wound protection
- Soft, absorbent pad helps manage light exudate
- Breathable material allows air circulation for faster healing
- Latex-free for reduced risk of skin irritation

Specifications:
- Size: 3 x 4 inches (7.6 x 10.2 cm)
- Material: Non-woven fabric with non-adherent contact layer
- Sterility: Individually sterile packaged
- Quantity: Sold per box (quantity varies by purchase option)

Use Suggestion:
Ideal for covering minor burns, lacerations, or post-procedure wounds. Clean the wound with saline or antiseptic, place the dressing over the affected area, and secure with medical tape or a bandage. Change as needed or when soiled.

Product Reviews

(1 review) Write a Review

1 Review

  • 5
    Better than Accu-Chek

    Posted by denimjuls on Jul 21st 2023

    After using this for more than a couple of months I found that it's more accurate & consistent than Acc-Chek.